<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>STEREO.org.ua &#187; UNIX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/tag/unix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua</link>
	<description>Photo &#38; Live Audio news from Ukraine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:13:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Выбор мини-ноутбука: Eee PC 901 vs. Samsung NC10</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/eee-pc-901-vs-samsung-nc10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/eee-pc-901-vs-samsung-nc10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/?p=712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[en]Eee PC 901 screen seems awful, the keyboard is similar. But the worst part is the built-in BT is not compatible with stock Linux Xandros when it comes to EDGE. So is Samsung NC10 an alternative?[ru]После Twinhead Slimnote 486DX/33 я &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/eee-pc-901-vs-samsung-nc10/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/eee-pc-901-vs-samsung-nc10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Самые популярные фамилии абонентов «Укртелеком»</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/kiev-09-phones-db-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/kiev-09-phones-db-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile / Telecoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Киев]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Коммуникации]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Прямой-номер]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[en]Having some SQL fun with a large city's phone directory.[ru] Шевченко Коваленко Ткаченко - тройка лидеров среди &#8220;фамильных&#8221; пользователей «Укртелеком». Под этими фамилиями зарегистрировано соответсвенно 3761, 3537 и 3075 домашних телефонов в Киеве. Самые телефонизированные улицы Киева: В. Маяковского Пр. &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/kiev-09-phones-db-fun/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/kiev-09-phones-db-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Диапазон прямых номеров Интертелеком</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/intertelecom-local-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/intertelecom-local-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile / Telecoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Киев]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security / Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Интернет]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Коммуникации]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Мобильная-связь]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Прямой-номер]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/?p=588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Экспериментальным путём определён список прямых номеров оператора мобильной телефонии CDMA Интертелеком. <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/intertelecom-local-numbers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/intertelecom-local-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Учёт времени работы за компьютером</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[en]Is time-tracking software like Visual TimeAnalyzer any good? Are fancy charts with questionable correctness worth of complicating worker's interactions with computer even further? Probably an old-fashioned week-planner, either paper or electronic with printing option, would make it better as a &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1200000000 seconds since Jan 1 1970 00:00 GMT</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you know, UNIX time is counted in seconds since Thursday, January 1 1970 Midnight (called the Epoch). For the last three years admins around the world have been watching double-ones in logs&#8217; timestamps, like in 1123456789 Today it&#8217;s all &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to copy directories preserving timestamps in Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[boring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absurd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How-To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.xxcopy.com/xxcopy15.htm">Windows File Date and Time is a painful topic</a>. Especially when it comes to directories (or "folders") <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Linux is free? FireFox so decided</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/linux-firefox-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/linux-firefox-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speculations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/linux-firefox-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[en]FireFox, сам по себе являющийся "бесплатным" продуктом, оказывается, спонсирует "бесплатный" Линукс.[ru]Did you ever wonder at the Linux &#8220;distros&#8221; sprouting wildly? They are countless already; nobody knows the exact number: Knoppix, CentOS, Ubuntu, Kubuntu&#8230; The most surprising part is they compete. &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/linux-firefox-google/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/linux-firefox-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GnuCash for Windows available after 10 years in UNIX</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/gnucash-for-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/gnucash-for-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GnuCash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/gnucash-for-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GnuCash team has been famous in the past for their harshness towards anything &#8220;Windows&#8221;. No wonder &#8211; the 1st version of GC was written in 1997 in Motif for X Window System which was (and still is?) light years ahead &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/gnucash-for-windows/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/gnucash-for-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email-to-SMS as &#8220;Push e-mail&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/email-to-sms-as-push-e-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/email-to-sms-as-push-e-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile / Telecoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Мобильная-связь]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/email-to-sms-as-push-e-mail/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since my very first days with a GSM handset I&#8217;ve been heavily using this little yet essential service &#8211; Email-to-SMS gateway. In fact, this part of the mobile package was determinative in deciding to enter then-undue mobile realm. Fast forward &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/email-to-sms-as-push-e-mail/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/email-to-sms-as-push-e-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Google really look at text vs. bg colors?</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/seo-invisible-text-detection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/seo-invisible-text-detection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlebot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search_engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stylesheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/seo-invisible-text-detection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very long ago I heard a tale (perhaps from Google itself) about how bad (and dangerous from SEO / SE banning point of view) it is to use extremely low contrast text, i.e. bright yellow text on white background or &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/seo-invisible-text-detection/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2007/seo-invisible-text-detection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

