<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>STEREO.org.ua &#187; UNIX &amp; Computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/all-about/unix-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua</link>
	<description>Photo &#38; Live Audio news from Ukraine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:13:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Экстремальный зелёный компьютинг</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2009/green-computing-extreme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2009/green-computing-extreme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[en]Are you ready to commit to green computing full scale? Is adaptive CPU throttling not enough? Then go throttle it to the lowest attainable frequency permanently.[ru]Новые процессоры AMD &#38; Intel способны понижать свою рабочую частоту и напряжение питания. Потребляемая мощность &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2009/green-computing-extreme/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2009/green-computing-extreme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>site down for 12h</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2009/site-down-for-12h/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2009/site-down-for-12h/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[boring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security / Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ongoing Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[en]For the first time in STEREO's history the site has been down for more than 12 hours due to DB data error.[ru]Впервые за историю STEREO.org.ua пролежал более половины суток. Вчера около 3 дня сел позаниматься писаниной на блоге. Сижу, пишу. &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2009/site-down-for-12h/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2009/site-down-for-12h/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Выбор мини-ноутбука: Eee PC 901 vs. Samsung NC10</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/eee-pc-901-vs-samsung-nc10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/eee-pc-901-vs-samsung-nc10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/?p=712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[en]Eee PC 901 screen seems awful, the keyboard is similar. But the worst part is the built-in BT is not compatible with stock Linux Xandros when it comes to EDGE. So is Samsung NC10 an alternative?[ru]После Twinhead Slimnote 486DX/33 я &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/eee-pc-901-vs-samsung-nc10/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/eee-pc-901-vs-samsung-nc10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Нужен ли винчестер на 340 ТераБайт?</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/340-tb-hdd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/340-tb-hdd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speculations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/?p=594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[en]10 years ago a 340 MB HDD was fairly common. Now it is 340 GB. Convenient for keeping a hundred DVD's at hand. According to Moor's Law, we'll have 340 TB of storage in average PC in another 10 years. &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/340-tb-hdd/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/340-tb-hdd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Учёт времени работы за компьютером</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[en]Is time-tracking software like Visual TimeAnalyzer any good? Are fancy charts with questionable correctness worth of complicating worker's interactions with computer even further? Probably an old-fashioned week-planner, either paper or electronic with printing option, would make it better as a &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/simple-time-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Без прав Администратора работать можно</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/windows-non-admin-is-easy-ru/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/windows-non-admin-is-easy-ru/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Security / Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[по-русски]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How-To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/windows-non-admin-is-easy-ru/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Когда новоиспечённый пользователь ПК показывает своё чудо, обычно видишь стандартную картину: ОС Windows XP Professional, которую установил продавец или друг (или друг-продавец), на ней пользователь под именем &#8220;User&#8221;, этот user, вопреки своему названию, имеет полные права администратора компьютера. И с &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/windows-non-admin-is-easy-ru/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/windows-non-admin-is-easy-ru/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What System Cache is for?</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/what-system-cache-is-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/what-system-cache-is-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/what-system-cache-is-for/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course, it is supposed to speed up disk access. But long passed the times when absence of disk cache made computers literally unusable. These days cache is largely for mere user convenience &#8211; it reduces continual annoying small waits &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/what-system-cache-is-for/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/what-system-cache-is-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1200000000 seconds since Jan 1 1970 00:00 GMT</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you know, UNIX time is counted in seconds since Thursday, January 1 1970 Midnight (called the Epoch). For the last three years admins around the world have been watching double-ones in logs&#8217; timestamps, like in 1123456789 Today it&#8217;s all &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/1200000000-seconds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to copy directories preserving timestamps in Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[boring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absurd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How-To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.xxcopy.com/xxcopy15.htm">Windows File Date and Time is a painful topic</a>. Especially when it comes to directories (or "folders") <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/how-to-copy-directories-preserving-timestamps-in-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you really need your Bookmarks?</title>
		<link>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/do-you-really-need-your-bookmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/do-you-really-need-your-bookmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips & tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX & Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search_engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/do-you-really-need-your-bookmarks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(or old mail in the Inbox for that matter) I have outlived a good number of different web browsers already: Netscape Navigator 3.0, Netscape Communicator 4.0, Mozilla, Opera etc. Sometimes I&#8217;d transfer the bulk of bookmarks over to a new &#8230; <a href="http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/do-you-really-need-your-bookmarks/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stereo.org.ua/2008/do-you-really-need-your-bookmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

